ABM budget calculator
Before you commit a quarter to a named-account programme, work out what it costs to reach the list you have chosen at the frequency you actually need. Most programmes are under-funded for their list size, and the maths takes about a minute.
This sizes reach, not outcomes. It answers “can I afford to be seen by this list at this frequency”, which is the question most programmes get wrong before creative is ever discussed. It assumes even delivery; in practice the auction concentrates impressions unless you cap frequency and split tiers into separate campaigns.
Three ways the number comes back wrong
The budget is far above what you have
The correct response is almost always to cut the list, not the frequency. Reaching 150 accounts properly beats reaching 400 accounts occasionally, and the second option produces a report that looks fine and a pipeline that does not.
The budget looks suspiciously low
Check the match rate. A programme sized on a 95% assumed match that runs at 62% will spend its money on a fifth of the list and report an average that hides it.
It looks affordable but nothing moves
Reach is necessary and not sufficient. If coverage is good and stage movement is not, the problem is creative or offer — which is a much better problem to have, because you can now see it.
Once you know the budget, find out where it actually landed.
Kairo shows delivery by account, so the plan and the reality can be compared.